Join our team

In Thailand, the key distinction between NPAE (Non-Publicly Accountable Entities) and PAE (Publicly Accountable Entities) lies in the type of business and their financial reporting obligations.

NPAE (Non-Publicly Accountable Entities)

A Non-Publicly Accountable Entity (NPAE) is a business that does not meet the criteria of being publicly accountable. Specifically, an entity qualifies as an NPAE if:

• It does not have equity instruments or bonds traded on a public market (e.g., stock exchanges).
• It is not required to submit its financial statements to securities regulators for public disclosure.

Typically, NPAEs are smaller, privately owned businesses that do not have significant public investors or widespread financial reporting obligations.

PAE (Publicly Accountable Entities)

Publicly Accountable Entities (PAEs), or Public Company Limited (PLC), refers to companies that are publicly accountable due to their size, business activities, or regulatory requirements. These entities often have publicly traded shares and are subject to stricter financial reporting standards due to their broader public impact. In Thailand, well-known companies in industries such as construction, engineering, or finance typically fall under this category.

PAEs are required to follow more detailed and comprehensive accounting standards because they have significant public interest and oversight.

Accounting Standards in Thailand:

Non-listed and listed companies in Thailand can choose between two sets of accounting standards for external financial reporting, depending on whether they are classified as NPAEs or PAEs:

TFRS for NPAEs:

Thai Financial Reporting Standards for Non-Publicly Accountable Entities (TFRS for NPAEs) is a simplified set of standards designed for smaller, privately-held businesses. These standards are less complex than those for PAEs, making them more suitable for companies without significant public investors or market exposure.

TFRS for PAEs:

Thai Financial Reporting Standards for Publicly Accountable Entities (TFRS for PAEs) apply to publicly traded companies and large entities that meet the criteria for public accountability. These standards are more detailed and align with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), ensuring consistency with global accounting practices.

Key Differences:

• NPAE refers to privately held companies that are not publicly accountable (i.e., they do not have publicly traded equity or bonds).
• PAE refers to Public Company Limited entities that are publicly accountable, such as those listed on the stock exchange or with significant public shareholders.
• NPAEs follow TFRS for NPAEs, while PAEs follow TFRS for PAEs, which is converged with IFRS.

The classification of a company as an NPAE or PAE determines the set of accounting standards it must follow for financial reporting, with NPAEs opting for simpler standards and PAEs adhering to more detailed, IFRS-aligned guidelines.

Selecting the Appropriate Accounting Standards for Optimal Strategic Advancement

Selecting whether to adopt Thailand Financial Reporting Standards for Publicly Accountable Entities (TFRS for PAEs) early in a company's lifecycle is a major decision that requires careful consideration of the benefits and challenges involved. Here's a breakdown of the key factors to consider:

1. Cost of Transition

Transitioning to TFRS for PAEs can be expensive, involving both one-time and ongoing costs:

• Initial setup costs: This includes upgrading accounting systems, changing reporting structures, and potentially hiring external consultants to guide the transition.
• Ongoing costs: Once TFRS for PAEs is adopted, companies must continuously update their systems, retrain staff, and keep up with evolving compliance requirements.

Key takeaway:

For early-stage companies with limited budgets, these costs can be burdensome and may detract from other growth priorities.

2. Impact on Internal Systems

Adopting TFRS for PAEs often requires significant changes to internal financial systems and processes:

• Chart of accounts: Businesses may need to redesign their chart of accounts to align with TFRS requirements.
• Internal controls and reporting: Existing financial controls, reporting formats, and data collection processes may need to be adjusted to meet TFRS for PAEs standards.

Key takeaway:

These changes can be complex and time-consuming, especially for small or growing companies that may lack the resources to implement such modifications efficiently.

3. Need for Specialized Personnel

TFRS compliance demands specialized knowledge:

• Companies may need to hire or train staff with expertise in TFRS and financial reporting.
• A dedicated team is often required to ensure ongoing compliance, which can be challenging for smaller companies with limited personnel.

Key takeaway:

Small businesses or startups might struggle to find the right talent or allocate the resources needed to manage TFRS compliance, potentially diverting attention from other critical business activities.

4. Volatility of Accounting Standards

TFRS for PAEs, like many accounting frameworks, is subject to frequent updates and changes. Staying compliant can be challenging because:

• Companies need to stay updated on the latest revisions and new interpretations of the standards.
• Regular updates to accounting systems and internal processes may be required to accommodate these changes.

Key takeaway:

For companies in fast-evolving industries or with limited resources, keeping up with the ongoing changes in TFRS for PAEs could become an ongoing challenge and an additional administrative burden.

5. Strategic Decision – Timing of Adoption

Early adoption of TFRS for PAEs can provide several advantages, but it also requires careful timing:

Advantages of early adoption:

• Credibility with investors: Early adoption helps companies build trust with external stakeholders, such as investors or lenders, by demonstrating transparency and commitment to high-quality financial reporting.
• International alignment: For companies planning to expand or attract foreign investment, adopting TFRS for PAEs early can ensure their financial reporting is aligned with international standards.

Drawbacks of premature adoption:

• Cost and complexity: For small businesses or those not yet seeking outside investment, adopting TFRS for PAEs too early may introduce unnecessary complexity and cost.
• Focus on growth: Early-stage companies may benefit more from concentrating on operational growth and market development rather than diverting resources toward compliance.

Key takeaway:

If the company plans to raise capital, attract investors, or expand internationally, adopting TFRS early can provide strategic advantages. However, for businesses focused on domestic growth or those with limited resources, delaying adoption may be the better choice.